Shell Cordovan crack

Florsheim Imperial 93605 Deconstruction

This post might stun you. I took apart a pair of iconic Florsheim Imperial 93605 Kenmoors. It’s not stunning like Weezer covering Toto’s Africa but its close. I know that the 93605 is a “grail” pair for many shoe collectors but this pair was broken. So, don’t be mad. Read on. And bless the rains down in Africa. Gonna take some time to do the things we never had.

I found this pair last year. It was a 1987 version of the 93605 and barely worn based on the condition of the sole. Since the pair wasn’t my size I thought I could resell them. For mucho dinero. But something was not quite right with the pair, it had a strange crease-like fold across the vamp. If you remember your Shell Cordovan 101 ownership and safety training, the first rule of Shell is that you always talk about Shell. And the second rule of Shell is that you always talk about Shell. And of course, the third rule is that Shell Cordovan doesn’t crease. Thus it was strange that this pair had a crease. The pair was also dirty. That was not strange.

The Shell looked dry to my trained eye. I flexed the upper slightly near the shoe mouth and the Shell cracked. The other side was already cracked as well but I hadn’t noticed it. And with those cracks went my dream of a big payday. Back to pressuring friends to buy nutritional shakes. It’s a superfood really. I can provide a free sample. Call me.

When Shell Cordovan dries out, it can become brittle and crack. The cracking tends to occur in the areas that receive stress such as the heel counter or the eyelets. You can see examples in my guide to buying a 93605. When buying a vintage Shell pair look for damage in these areas. And if you see a crack, you should assume more cracking is likely. You can live with cracked Shell Cordovan uppers but it’s not possible to fix the cracks. There’s nothing that a hundred men or more could ever do.

After the cracking incident, these shoes were stored in a box until I had the idea of taking them apart. I wanted to deconstruct them stitch by stitch. A number of years ago, I read an article from ex-Allen Edmonds CEO Paul Grangaard who said that you could completely unstitch a pair of Allen Edmonds shoes and put them back together with new stitching (but I couldn’t find this article)(so I may be lying)(but I believe my lie)(which is the truth). With this inspiration, I armed myself with several vintage leather tools, a shoe anvil, a box cutter, and went to work taking the shoes apart.

After first pulling out the insole heel pad, I then removed the entire heel. This was easy to do. You can pry the entire heel off by inserting a blade between the heel and outsole and applying some pressure. The heel was attached with 11 square nails. No adhesive was used to attach the heel.

The heel itself was composed of three stacked pieces. The first layer (the toplift), was leather with about 60 nails and a v-cleat insert. The second and third layer was made from fiberboard, not leather. I assume this was done to reduce costs. The v-cleat is attached with a threaded nail.

The heel was likely premade and then attached to each shoe at the time of construction. I have seen various versions of the Florsheim heel. Some are stamped with the manufacturer. Many use vinyl/plastic instead of fiberboard for the middle layer. A few of my 1960s Imperials appear to have a full leather heel but I am not 100% sure on that fact. So it may not be a fact. But it is a fact that the $1000 Balenciaga Triple S was the hotest shoe of 2018. Go figure.

The pair is Goodyear welted. I was able to detach the sole by running my knife between the welt and the outsole to cut the welt stitching. It wasn’t difficult and no glue was used adhere the outsole to the shoe.

The double leather sole was heavy. About a half pound on my scale. It was also surprisingly flexible given that the leather was a half inch thick. I am no leather expert, but I found the sole leather to be higher quality than the heel leather. I am probably a bit late though to alert Florsheim quality assurance about this issue.

Florsheim Shoe Construction

Beneath the sole was a layer of cork with an embedded fiberglass shank that looked somewhat like a pork rib bone. The shank was easy to pull out and had a slight bend to it. It may have been attached with a small amount of glue but it seemed like it was simply inset when the hot cork fill was applied under the insole.

The leather storm welt was attached to the shoe with thick, white cotton stitching. The stitching went through the base of the Shell Cordovan upper. The upper itself was attached with copper staples. I cut through a section of the welt stitching and was able to simply pull the leather welt off the rest of the shoe with a small amount of force. As sure as Kilimanjaro rises like Olympus above the Serengeti.

The upper, the welt, and the insole are all attached to a ribbon of canvas that was glued beneath the insole. This is called gemming and it is essentially the backbone of the shoe. Most Goodyear welted shoes use gemming. It’s not just a Florsheim thing. You can see it in the photo below.

Years ago, there has was considerable online debate about gemming and if it is the fatal flaw of modern Goodyear welted construction. If the gemming fails, the insole separates from the rest of the shoe and requires the shoe to be relasted to fix it. On the anti-gemming side is well known shoemaker DW Frommer. He has posted frequently on the topic and his feelings are best summarized by this statement: “my lifelong abhorrence of, and subsequent crusade against, gemming”. The ShoeSnob later weighed in and basically said that gemming failure is unlikely since people don’t typically have their shoes resoled more than two times.

Should you worry about your Goodyear welted shoes falling apart? Should I? Is this a real issue? I was a bit skeptical (as usual). I have never experienced my insole separating and the gemming on this Florsheim pair was well secured. To answer these questions, I asked a cobbler friend, Steve Doudaklian of Bedo’s Leatherworks, about gemming failure. Steve said he encountered it fairly often and that it occurred in one in five Allen Edmonds pairs. Sure enough, if you watch one of Steve’s videos on an Allen Edmonds repair, it appears the gemming has separated from the insole. Ouch. So, it is a real issue. But don’t lose sleep over it unless you plan to resole your Goodyear welted pairs often.

The insole of the 93605 was a thick and heavy piece of leather. The famous Florsheim five nails fully penetrated the insole but the nail tips were mostly covered by a leather heel pad.

After the sole and welt were removed, I started executing my plan of taking apart the right shoe upper stitch by stitch. I abandoned this plan right around the three-minute mark. Which I had the right to do. I found that the two rows of tight stitching right next to the edge of the broguing was too difficult to undo. Maybe I didn’t have the right tools. Or I wasn’t doing it right. And I probably didn’t have the right patience. It’s my adult ADHD, right? I obviously need to right myself.

I was hoping to find a Horween stamp on the backside of the Shell Cordovan upper but I did not. Sad. There were some manufacturing numbers. Maybe the stamp was on the left shoe. Or maybe not.

The glove leather lining was particularly impressive. The pair was fully leather lined and the lining was soft, supple and fairly thick. I believe the lining is kid leather. The lining was perforated with vent holes within the toe box area. There was also the toe, heel, and eyelet reinforcements between the lining and Shell Cordovan upper.

And there you have it, a deconstructed 93605. The fiberglass shank and fiberboard in the heel were a bit surprising but Florsheim had a price point that was more like modern Allen Edmonds than Alden. The upper stitching is amazing and all the leathers used in this shoe (upper, outsole, lining and insole), are high quality. I still think that even a 1980s Florsheim 93605 compares favorably to a modern Alden 975. And I own and like both.

I hope you enjoyed the article. Have a question? Leave a comment below.



11 thoughts on “Florsheim Imperial 93605 Deconstruction”

  1. When I saw you posted something, I thought “Hurry, boy*, it’s waiting there for you.” (*My therapist sees me referring to myself like this as a red flag.)

    Very cool and informative post. Love to see how these shoes were put together, and how they can easily be resoled.

  2. Extremely interesting post, David! I always look forward to your blog posts. I love my 93605s and it was fascinating to see the construction broken down this way. Thanks for sharing!

  3. It that horsehair padding?

    Very surprised at the fiberboard heel stack, fiberglass shank and the fiber/cloth heel cup. Surely those weren’t the details in the older models… (?)

  4. I read, l laughed, and l cried. Then l remembered that l have a cracking pair (not in the British sense) of 93605s…. so l cried again.

  5. I too have crack fear and am hopeful that Initial Nexol drenching is a ward against it. For equal parts aesthetic and crack protection I’m actually considering having brass eyelets retrofitted to a favourite pair of Alden PTBs (via Steve, of course).

    Really interesting article, as ever…. also surprised at the fiberglass shank, I would’ve assumed metal. And gemming failure has now made me question the ‘last forever if looked after’ aspect of Florsheim level constructed shoes. Need to read more about that 🙂

    1. Nexol = Lexol: I seemingly have a permanent mental block on the difference between real and fictional leather conditioner brand names

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.